<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video Removed: Copyright Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:23:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Mas</title>
		<link>http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-43686</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Mas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/#comment-43686</guid>
		<description>A mi tambien me an retirado un vídeo, y no acabo de entender muy bien porqué..  si el que canta soy yo. Tambien e hecho un escrito a &quot; Schott Music GmbH &amp; Co. KG&quot;  pero no se nada todavía.
Lo e vuelto a colgar a ver que pasa  jeje..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mi tambien me an retirado un vídeo, y no acabo de entender muy bien porqué..  si el que canta soy yo. Tambien e hecho un escrito a &#8221; Schott Music GmbH &amp; Co. KG&#8221;  pero no se nada todavía.<br />
Lo e vuelto a colgar a ver que pasa  jeje..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-9661</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 18:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/#comment-9661</guid>
		<description>re: copyright (particularly in the United States)...
worth reading: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Copyrights-Copywrongs-Intellectual-Threatens-Creativity/dp/0814788076/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5484501-1528654?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1180029427&amp;sr=8-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Siva Vaidhyanathan&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: copyright (particularly in the United States)&#8230;<br />
worth reading: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Copyrights-Copywrongs-Intellectual-Threatens-Creativity/dp/0814788076/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5484501-1528654?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1180029427&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">Siva Vaidhyanathan&#8217;s <i>Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity</i></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-6203</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/#comment-6203</guid>
		<description>Carmina Burana has about a few years left on their copyright. Anything created between 1924-1964 has a copyright of 95 years in the US (no death limitation for those dates in the US). Carmina Burana was created in 1934-36, so 1934 + 95 = ~2029. If it was created before 1923, the copyright would be gone. In most other countries its based on the time after the compose has died, anywhere from 30 to 70 years in many cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carmina Burana has about a few years left on their copyright. Anything created between 1924-1964 has a copyright of 95 years in the US (no death limitation for those dates in the US). Carmina Burana was created in 1934-36, so 1934 + 95 = ~2029. If it was created before 1923, the copyright would be gone. In most other countries its based on the time after the compose has died, anywhere from 30 to 70 years in many cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-6144</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/#comment-6144</guid>
		<description>You said you were going to post your reasoning for you comment on my blog on your site.  Where is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said you were going to post your reasoning for you comment on my blog on your site.  Where is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrik</title>
		<link>http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-6046</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iampablo.com/archives/video-removed-copyright-infringement/#comment-6046</guid>
		<description>P.S. You should have included a critique of the piece in the posting.  That way, you can claim that you were using a excerpt for a specific reason.  You are completely entitled to use a portion of any work for criticism, or parody for that matter.  So you could have mocked it if you wanted to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. You should have included a critique of the piece in the posting.  That way, you can claim that you were using a excerpt for a specific reason.  You are completely entitled to use a portion of any work for criticism, or parody for that matter.  So you could have mocked it if you wanted to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
